379 b ipc definition. Section 379 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 2019-01-26

379 b ipc definition Rating: 9,4/10 129 reviews

Difference between “Cognizable Offences” and “Non

379 b ipc definition

Investigating officers said the pair ticked all the provisions required to be charged under the stringent Act with both being gang leaders actively involved in snatching, robberies and heinous crimes. Abettor A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable of law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor. Non-attendance in obedience to an order form public servant Whoever, being legally bound to attend in person or by an agent at a certain place and time in obedience to a summons, notice, order or proclamation proceeding from any public servant legally competent, as such public servant, to issue the same, intentionally omits to attend at that place or time, or departs from the place where he is bound to attend before the time at which it is lawful for him to depart, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hun­dred rupees, or with both, or, if the summons, notice, order or proclamation is to attend in person or by agent in a Court of Justice, with simple imprison­ment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Vinayak Tukaram Utekar, 1997 2 Crimes 615 Bom. Here A, at the time of first moving the ring, commits theft.


Next

Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code

379 b ipc definition

Nexus between common object and offence There must be nexus between the common object and the offence committed and if it is found that the same was committed to accomplish the common object every member of the assembly will become liable for the same; Allauddin Mian Sharif Mian v. Distinction between rash and negligent act The appellant was charged with an offence under section 304A for causing death of one M by contact with the electrically charged copper wire which he had fixed up at the back of his house with a view to prevent the entry of intruders into his latrine. Illustration Z dies in possession of furniture and money. Wrongful loss means the loss brought about by unlawful means. None of the injuries was on a vital part of the body of the deceased. A sells it immediately without attempting to discover the owner.

Next

What means section 129(B) and 379 RW 34 IPC

379 b ipc definition

Illustrations a A cuts down a tree on Z's around, with the intention of dishonestly taking the tree out of Z's possession without Z's consent. A by taking it, commits no theft, though he may commit criminal misappropriation of property. The requirements of the section are not satisfied by the act of homicide being one of extreme recklessness. If he intended, or knew himself to be likely to cause only simple hurt, he cannot be convicted for the offence under section 325 even if the resultant hurt was grievous. A has committed the offence defined in this section. In the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in its application to the State of Haryana, after section 379, the section 379-A 1 and 2 shall be inserted namely; Snatching - Whoever, with the intention to commit theft, suddenly or quickly or forcibly seizes or secures or grabs or takes away from any person or from his possession any moveable property, and makes or attempts to make escape with such property, is said to commit snatching.

Next

Haryana assembly passes IPC and CCP amendment bills

379 b ipc definition

Therefore A is liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and also to a fine; and if any hurt be done to Z in consequence of the abetment, he will be liable to imprisonment for a term which may extend to fourteen years, and to fine. A has not yet committed the offence. The intended victim ate some of the sweets and threw the rest away which were picked up by two children who ate them and died of poisoning. Act done pursuant to the judgment or order of Court Nothing which is done in pursuance of, or which is warranted by the judgment or order of, a Court of Justice ; if done whilst such judgment or order remains in force, is an offence, notwithstanding the Court may have had no jurisdiction to pass such judgment or order, provided the person doing the act in good faith believes that the Court had such jurisdiction. Sexual orientation is an essential attribute of privacy.

Next

Indian Penal Code: Theft

379 b ipc definition

Exception 4: Heat of passion Mere sudden quarrel would not entitle the accused to seek for Exception 4 to section 300; Samuthram alias Samudra Rajan v. In March 2016, Tharoor tried to reintroduce the private member's bill to decriminalize homosexuality, but was voted down for the second time. Illustration A attacks Z under such circumstances of grave provocation that his killing of Z would be only culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Communication made in good faith No communication made in good faith is an offence by reason of any harm to the person to whom it is made, if it is made for the benefit of that person. The Naz Foundation worked with a legal team from the to engage in court. Essentials of Theft 1- Dishonest Intention It is provided in the definition that there must be a dishonest intention for an act to be considered as Theft. Ingredients i Self inflicted injuries not explained by prosecution except the reliance on medical evidence acquittal of accused not justified; Chuhar Singh v.

Next

First conviction under Sec 379A in Haryana: Gurgaon smartphone snatcher gets 5

379 b ipc definition

A is guilty of an offence under this section. Exception This provision does not extend to the case in which the harbour is given by a wife to her husband. Illustration A instigates B to murder Z. A, intending to rob Z, seizes the pole and stops the palanquin. For his part, Tharoor expressed surprise at the bill's rejection at this early stage. Mere membership of the unlawful assembly is sufficient; State of Maharashtra v.

Next

Indian Penal Code

379 b ipc definition

Effacing, writing from substance bearing Government stamp, or removing from document a stamp used for it, with intent to cause loss to Government Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to the Government, removes or effaces from any substance, bearing any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, any writing or document for which such stamp has been used, or removes from any writing or document a stamp which has been used for such writing or document, in order that such stamp may be used for a different writing or document, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Illustration A instigates B to resist by force a distress made by a public servant. This is murder, in as much as the provocation was not given by the child, and the death of the child was not caused by accident or misfortune in doing an act caused by the provocation. Explanation 1 A statement is within the meaning of this section, whether it is made verbally or otherwise. Explanation A person commits this offence who counterfeits by causing a genuine stamp of one denomination to appear like a genuine stamp of a different denomination. It has substantially survived for over 150 years in several jurisdictions without major amendments. Its basis is the law of England freed from superfluities, technicalities and local peculiarities.

Next

First conviction under Sec 379A in Haryana: Gurgaon smartphone snatcher gets 5

379 b ipc definition

Making or selling instrument for counterfeiting coin Whoever makes or mends, or performs any part of the process of making or mending, or buys, sells or disposes of, any die or instrument, for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. The words in italics were subs. . Abettor when liable to cumulative punishment for act abetted and for act done If the act for which the abettor is liable under the last preceding section is committed in addition to the act abetted, and constitutes a distinct offence, the abettor is liable to punishment for each of the offences. Illustration A sees Z commit what appears to A to be a murder. Right to die vis-a-vis Right not to die The Supreme Court has set aside its earlier judgment in P.


Next