Introduce the next interpretation by noting how it is similar to the first. When considering how to write a Masters essay, it can be tricky to understand and achieve the subtle differences between Masters and undergraduate level work. What follows, therefore, skips philosophical issues and instead offers practical advice on how to write an essay that will get top marks. Show you understand them, and use both cross-reference to prove the same viewpoint. This is a tougher structure to master, but it works like a charm. For everything you say you must have a supporting fact or example — otherwise your essay will be just so much hot air.
If they have not given you a structure, familiarize yourself with each of the interpretations. It is not enough to analyse certain idea, you must recognise their place in the whole. For example: to what extent were the rebellions of 1549 examples of local economic uprisings? You first spend a paragraph explaining the views espoused by the sources. If possible you should always examine the book or article from which the quotation has been taken in order to discover what its author meant by it, to discover how the author has understood the issues. Weigh evidence, analyse arguments and develop your own position. The second is to write a narrative of events — often beginning with the birth of an individual — with a half-hearted attempt at answering the question in the final paragraph. Of course, exactly what constitutes 'the evidence' is almost invariably one of the issues under discussion among the historians who are most deeply engaged with the problem, but in general for each historical question there will be a body of evidence which is recognised as being relevant to it.
You formulate an argument, or perhaps voice alternative lines of argument, that you will substantiate later in the essay. If the supporting evidence is not a well-known and irrefutable fact, it will probably need to be given the additional support of a footnote indicating where you have obtained your information or which historian's interpretation of the piece of evidence being deployed you have chosen to follow. Do not ignore this advice. In doing so, they must apply knowledge and understanding of the historical context to these arguments and interpretations; deployment of knowledge that does not relate to the extracts will, however, not be credited. The examiner knows that you cannot cover everything. This does not prove your point. One way of answering the question would be set up a series of 'tests', as it were, that can be investigated in turn.
It is an effective strategy, especially when writing a short essay, to begin with a bold, attention-grabbing, first sentence which shows the marker that you know what you are doing: that is, answer the question as briefly as possible with your first sentence. Section A is short ~20 minutes and will ask you to compare and contrasts two sources. Decide which 1 or 2 seem most convincing use your knowledge. Keep the content itself very even-handed, sitting on the fence rather than presenting a forceful opinion that could distract attention away from the quality of your use of French. First address Source A in a block, then Source B in another block and for A level Source C in a final block. And when did the rise to power actually start? At the very least it must be competent.
What how want to know is that you understand and can explain the main driving forces certain historical events. You can write brilliantly and argue a case with a wealth of convincing evidence, but if you are not being relevant then you might as well be tinkling a cymbal. It shows an examiner that you have planned your essay, know what you are going to say and in all probability will support it with good evidence. Writing need to make your answers as nuanced as possible or in other words, to include as much sophistication and complexity as possible. More important is that you demonstrate your understanding of the question set. This should be distinguished from remembering, daydreaming and idly speculating. First of all we ought to ask, What constitutes a good history essay? You then create a para for each cause and remember to always link to the question and try to explain in the paras why u think essay factor is weaker than the interpretation u most agree with.
You must show why your assessment is the best by considering its merits vis-à-vis alternative evaluations. They bear witness to what happened in the more highly urbanised regions of Europe — that is, to what happened in northern Italy and in the Low Countries — and even in these regions, merely to the experience of those who dwelt in the towns themselves but not to that of rural people. Follow your instincts: if the argument feels wrong, look for a better one. And make sure your conclusion is consistent with your overall argument. Outline, explain, and cross-reference to show you understand the overarching idea these sources are trying to espouse. Component 2 assesses understanding of depth and of the value of primary sources. Of course the traditional A Level candidate faced all nbsp; Writing Historical Essays — Rutgers History — Rutgers University : A Guide for Undergraduates.
However, it is very important that you make a clear judgement for each source, as that is what the question asks you to do. Two primary sources will be provided. Also you do not want to be penalised for writing too much. Make a brief plan of your proposed answer. The focus of these questions will be, as appropriate, on causation, change, continuity, similarity and significance in relation to a narrow issue or development. Plagiarism is thus not merely a matter of theft, it involves an entirely unacceptable subversion of the learning process. Basically, we can should 'x' but 'y' would appear to counter this, so therefore 'z'.
A-level history is all about writing essays. However, one thing is certain: your introduction must make a good impression. The key word in the above paragraphs is think. In Section B, two questions will be set of which students answer one. Transitioning into A-Levels can be rough.
An academic register is based in precision, formality, thorough understanding of subject-specific vocabulary, and an avoidance of familiarity and inappropriate use of the first person. Editing your Essay You will need to edit: for grammar, spelling and punctuation; to remove unnecessary verbiage, colloquialisms and jargon; to ensure that the footnotes and bibliography conform with the required style sheet; and for the coherence and quality of your writing. The good historian considers what may be inherent in a source, what vested interest the source might have, and what viewpoint that source was written from. The argument in A … Stick to the word limit. As the study of the ancient world primarily ancient Rome and Greece , Classical Civilisations combines archaeology and history, looking both at what survives materially from small finds, to art and sculpture, to temples and what survives in the way of texts by ancient authors. Instead, the major linguistic concerns at this level are those of tone and style. Although every essay will demand a unique answer, there are techniques common to all essays which will ensure that you don't go too far wrong.