State of Maharashtra, that it is fairly well settled that first information report is not a substantive piece of evidence and it can be used only to discredit the testimony of the maker thereof and it cannot be utilised for contradicting or discrediting the testimony of other witnesses. This is designed to keep the Magistrate informed of the investigation so as to enable him to control investigation and, if necessary, to give appropriate direction. It is difficult to believe that the appellants' father was not aware of the pendency of that suit. In comparison, the largest-magnitude coefficients of a minimum-phase filter are nearer to the beginning. For example, in the of Chapter , we found that the phase response was , which corresponds to a phase delay , or one-half sample. According to the prosecution, Antop Hill resident Murugan Devendra raped the minor on October 2, 2007, when she was alone at home.
Learned counsel, thus, argued that in the light of these surrounding circumstances, a clear case for conviction under Section 498-A I. . Sherrif supra and, therefore, it remains per incuriam and does not lay down the correct law. However, by that time, the suit filed by the present respondents stood decreed. The fundamental problem faced in this regard is to keep the powers and authority of the High Courts and Supreme Court within the boundaries of constitutionality and legality. When she was in a semi conscious 3 state, the police took her statement but she did not know what statement the police had recorded.
Under Indian criminal law, lodging a false F. Filing of an independent criminal proceeding, although initiated in terms of some observations made by the civil court, is not barred under any statute. But again on 19th April, 1996 at 11. In view of distance of police station and ignorance of parties, delay held not fatal. Sherrif supra and, therefore, it remains per incuriam and does not lay down the correct law. A similar view has been reiterated by this Court in Vishnu Dutt Sharma Vs.
In the next two sections we look at two alternative forms of the phase response: and. When a Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence upon receipt of a complaint or otherwise , he examines the complaint in accordance with Section 200 by examining the facts and the witnesses. In absence of such an explanation, the delay may be fatal. What is cruelty in one case may not amount to cruelty in another case. But the absence of intention should not make any difference in the case, if by ordinary sense in human affairs, the act complained of could otherwise be regarded as cruelty. Where the delay in filing F.
Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation. Findings of fact recorded by the Civil Court are not binding on the criminal courts or vice-versa. The public interests demand that criminal justice should be swift and sure; that the guilty should be punished while the events are still fresh in the public mind and that the innocent should be absolved as early as is consistent with a fair and impartial trial. It is also trite that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case and the one favourable to the accused has been taken by the trial court, it should not be disturbed. We may regard this input signal as an amplitude modulated.
Thus, the Judgment and Order of the High Court does not warrant any interference. Writ petition for quashing F. Thereby, the findings of the civil court get precedence over the findings recorded by the trial court, in particular, in summary trial for offences like Section 630. Filtering a signal introduces a delay. Shah supra was not approved.
Filtering a signal introduces a delay. The best thresholds of audibility table has been provided by. The Court, in the case of Munna Pooran Yadav vs. Shah supra was doubted by this Court and the case was referred to a larger Bench in K. Sarkar Ali Akkas, Law of criminal procedure, 2nd revised end, AnkurPrakashani, P 86 Section 24, Evidence Act 1872 An Analysis on the Probative Value of Evidence: A Review, Md.
While deciding the case, this Court placed reliance upon the Judgment of the Privy Council in Emperor Vs. Each has advantages and disadvantages. However, the facts and circumstances of the case do not warrant so. In a given case, if number of dead and injured persons is very high, delay in dispatching the report is natural. The degree of nonlinearity of the phase indicates the deviation of the group delay from a constant. The reason for quashing such proceedings may not be merely that the allegations were an after thought or had given a coloured version of events.
In such a case, where an F. The filter delay is not the latency. As a result of those injuries, Bhushan Lata died. In Munshi Prasad and Ors. Chagrined and frustrated litigants should not be permitted to give vent to their frustrations by cheaply invoking the jurisdiction of the criminal court. From a -analysis point of view, if the input to a filter with is and it can be clearly seen in this form that the phase delay expresses the phase response as a time delay in seconds. No action was taken till 1996 for non-execution of the sale deed.
Take an electrocardiogram reading sampled at 500 Hz for 1 s. In Girdhar Shankar Tawade v. And it has zero delay. Such a court cannot embark upon fruitless task of determining the issues by re-appreciating the evidence. The State of Punjab, the court gave an important view on the law regarding delay in recording F.