Ipc 204. IPC 201 2019-01-10

Ipc 204 Rating: 5,7/10 517 reviews

IPC 201

ipc 204

Act of a child above seven and under twelve of immature understanding Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion Section 84. A has fabricated false evidence. Tamil Nadu After section 292, insert the following new section namely:— 292A. The Supreme Court held that no ground for quashing the charge was made out; Nem Chand v. The Government has also directed the intelligence agencies to identify potential recruits and keep them under surveillance. If fifty rupees be paid or levied at the time of the expiration of those two months, or at any later time while A continues in imprisonment, A will be immediately discharged. There is no requirement of awarding any minimum sentence.

Next

Bell 204/205

ipc 204

Explanation The offender is said to be present if he is suffi­ciently near to put the other person in fear of instant death, of instant hurt, or of instant wrongful restraint. Section 304B and Section 498A — Distinction Section 304B is a substantive provision creating a new offence and not merely a provision effecting a change in procedure for trial of a pre-existing substantive offence. Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law: provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will. It is often cited that unfair investigation can not lead to fair trail and the case in hand points out the baised investigation. Altering appearance of coin with intent that it shall pass as coin of different description Whoever performs on any coin any operation which alters the appearance of that coin, with the intention that the said coin shall pass as a coin of a different description, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. Mischief by killing or maiming cattle, etc. Here B is guilty of murder.

Next

IPSD 204: eSchoolPlus Home Access Center

ipc 204

Here A may have commit­ted the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to Z by the whole beating, and also by each of the blows which make up the whole beating. Here, although A was doing an unlawful act, he was not guilty of culpable homicide, as he did not intend to kill B, or to cause death by doing an act that he knew was likely to cause death. Benefit of doubt When ocular evidence in murder case is unreliable benefit of doubt to be given to all accused; Chandu Bhai Shana Bhai Parmar v. Intention and knowledge It is fallacious to contend that when death is caused by a single blow, clause thirdly is not attracted and, therefore, it would not amount to murder. A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children. Owner or occupier of land on which an unlawful assembly is held Whenever any unlawful assembly or riot takes place, the owner or occupier of the land upon which such unlawful assembly is held, or such riot is committed, and any person having or claiming an interest in such land, shall be punishable with fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, if he or his agent or manager, knowing that such offence is being or has been committed, or having reason to believe it is likely to be committed, do not give the earliest notice thereof in his or their power to the principal officer at the nearest police-station, and do not, in the case of his or their having reason to believe that it was about to be committed, use all lawful means in his or their power to prevent, it and, in the event of its taking place, do not use all lawful means in his or their power to disperse or suppress the riot or unlawful assembly.

Next

IPC 204: Section 204 of the Indian Penal Code

ipc 204

Whoever assaults or threatens to assault, or obstructs or attempts to obstruct, any public servant in the discharge of his duty as such public servant, in endeavouring to disperse an unlawful assembly, or to suppress a riot or affray, or uses, or threatens, or attempts to use criminal force to such public servant, shall be punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. State of Tamil Nadu, 1997 2 Crimes 185 Mad. Once I overwrote it, the error stopped. Sale of counterfeit Government stamp Whoever, sells, or offers for sale, any stamp which he knows or has reason to believe to be a counterfeit of any stamp issued by the Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Comments Allegations of conspiracy in committing murder by group of 30 to 40 persons even though a strong suspicion raised regarding involvement of respondent where incident led to murder, prosecution evidence inconsistent — reversal of acquittal was proper; State of Haryana v.


Next

Bell 204/205

ipc 204

Not venturing to misappropriate the ring immediately for fear of search and detection, A hides the ring in a place where it is highly improbable that it will ever be found by Z, with the intention of taking the ring from the hiding place and selling it when the loss is forgotten. Later developed into the larger, twin-engine. Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow! Comments Abetment of attempt to commit suicide i It has been held that once the offence of abatement of committing suicide is clearly made out against accused, despite the fact that specific charge under section 306 was not framed against accused, would not preclude court from convicting accused for offence found proved; Prema S. Importation of girl from foreign country. A has voluntarily caused grievous hurt. Refusing to answer public servant authorised to question Whoever, being legally bound to state the truth on any subject to any public servant, refuses to answer any question demanded of him touching that subject by such public servant in the exercise of the legal powers of such public servant, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

Next

IPSD 204: eSchoolPlus Home Access Center

ipc 204

Injury which is likely to cause death and injury which is sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death i Accused inflicted 18 injuries in the arms and legs of the deceased with a gandasa. And whoever publishes any proposal to pay any sum, or to deliver any goods, or to do or forbear doing anything for the benefit of any person, on any event or contingency relative or applicable to the drawing of any ticket, lot, number or figure in any such lottery, shall be punished with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees. As per Concise Oxford Dictionary, 9th Edition, p. Non-appearance in response to a proclamation under section 82 of Act 2 of 1974. The onus on the accused is only to show that the defence version is probable one which is reflected from the salient features and the circum­stances in the prosecution case itself; Sawai Ram v.

Next

Cyber Crimes in India: Which state tops the chart?

ipc 204

Illustration A is at work with a hatchet; the head flies off and kills a man who is standing by. Wrongful confinement of person for whose liberation writ has been issued Whoever keeps any person in wrongful confinement, knowing that a writ for the liberation of that person has been duly issued, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years in addition to any term of imprisonment to which he may be liable under any other section of this chapter. Ingredients i When an offence is sought to be proved only on circumstan­tial evidence, the allegations of common intention under section 34 normally cannot be established in absence of meeting of mind, the overt act of the accused, by their conduct, by using the weapons by their utterance of words; Santosh Desai v. Punishment for wrongful restraint Whoever wrongfully restrains any person shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term, which may extend to one month, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both. A is liable to be punished in the same manner as if B had been capable by law of committing an offence, and had committed murder, and he is therefore subject to the punishment of death. Illustrations a A instigates a child to put poison into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose.

Next

Section 204 in The Indian Penal Code

ipc 204

State of Andhra Pradesh, 1997 7 Supreme Today 127. A carries the plate to a goldsmith and sells it. Harbouring persons hired for an unlawful assembly Whoever harbours, receives or assembles, in any house or premises in his occupation or charge, or under his control any persons, knowing that such persons have been hired, engaged or employed, or are about to be hired, engaged or employed, to join or become members of an unlawful assembly, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. Suicide is never to be presumed. It is only when a or b or c co-exist with d and e or there is a nexus between any of them and d , e would amount to robbery; State of Maharashtra v. Certain laws not to be affected by this Act. But in view of the social object of preventing social victimization or ostracism of the victim of a sexual offence for which section 228A has been enacted, it would be appropriate that in the judgements, be it of Supreme Court, High Court or lower court, the name of the victim should not be indicated; State of Punjab v.

Next

Section 202 and 204 of Crpc

ipc 204

Orissa Section 292A Same as in Tamil Nadu. A draws out a pistol. Adalat Prasad's judgement is also defective because it was passed considering the matter in hand as summons case but actually that was warrant procedure case. Karnataka is third with more than 3500 cases. Assault or criminal force in attempt wrongfully to confine a person Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, in attempting wrongfully to confine that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Powered by one T53-13A, max weight 9,500 pounds 10,500 for external loads , max passengers, 14. Amount of fine Where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine to which the offender is liable is unlimited, but shall not be excessive.

Next

Bell 204/205

ipc 204

Giving false evidence Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob, and he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob. Correct judgement was Subramaninan Sethuraman's case judgement which was passed in the matter of summon procedure case. A is liable to punishment under this section. C has therefore committed the offence defined in this section and is liable to the punishment for murder.

Next