The Sessions Judge, by his order 22. As a consequence thereof, the appeal against Ram Vijay also does not survive for its consideration on merits. According to learned counsel, the Sessions Judge rightly convicted respondent No. The actual punishment awarded depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case and various aggravating and mitigating circumstances present in the case. Imprisonment for 3 years and fine. Ipc Section 325 isn't just functional add your backyard, but also enhance comfort. One Ram Lagan deceased was also the resident of same village.
If that be so then he need not undergo any more jail sentence. If the above two conditions are satisfied then the operative part of the provision comes into play i. So far as Section 428 of Code is concerned, it provides that the period of detention spent in jail as under-trial or as convict will be set off against his total jail sentence once awarded to him in connection with the same offence. After due investigation, chargesheet was filed against all the five accused. Learned counsel urged that the High Court, in its discretion, could reduce the award of jail sentence to any period less than four years but, in no case, it could set aside the entire jail sentence and substitute it by awarding a sentence of fine of Rs.
The accused had given lathi blows on the son in a fit of rage without any intention to cause death. Punishment- Yadi vyakti doshi paya jata hai, to doshi vyakti ko 3 saal ki jail ya fine ya dono prakar ki sja ho sakti hai. Where the two appellants caused many injuries on the neck, knees and elbow which were all simple in nature and not on vital parts but one of the injuries on the head was given with much force causing depressed fracture and fissures all over resulting in death, and the evidence could not establish a common intention to cause death but only grievous hurt by lathi and khunt, they were held guilty under section 325 read with section 34. Their bail bonds shall stand discharged. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we find force in the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant and also of respondent No. Ipc Section 325 is labelled with Ipc Section 325, Ipc, Section, 325. Punishment- Yadi vyakti doshi paya jata hai, to doshi vyakti ko 7 saal ki jail aur fine bhi dena hoga.
The appellants and Partheeban-Accused No. Compoundable, with the permission of the court, by the person to whom hurt is caused Triable by whom? Cognizable Non-bailable Court of Session. Period of detention undergone by the accused to be set off against the sentence of imprisonment. The inference to be drawn from the manner of the origin of the occurrence, the manner in which the accused arrived at the scene and the concert with which attack was made and from the injuries caused by one or some of them. In such case, each of such persons will be liable for the same punishment as if that criminal act is done by that person alone even if the act was not done by that person alone. Incorporating substantial garden table and a garden can be turned by comfortable chairs in to a house dishes. Please consult legal experts with full details of your case before relying upon the advice given.
What is punishment for voluntarily causing hurt? One Ram Lagan deceased was also the resident of same village. This incident attracted many persons living in the area and who were passing on the road. नमस्कार दोस्तों, में पुष्पेश बाजपेयी, यह website मैंने अपने उन सभी दोस्तों के लिए बनाई है, जो हिन्दी भाषा में कानून की जानकारी लेना चाहते है,और हिन्दी में ही कानून से सम्बंधित उस हर एक जानकारी को पढ़ना, समझना और जानना चाहते है जो की उनके जीवन में कभी न कभी काम आएगी। में यहाँ हिंदी भाषा में कानून से सम्बंधित हर जानकारी को बहुत ही आसान तरीके से लिख कर समझाने की अपनी तरफ से पूरा प्रयास करूँगा, की मेरे द्वारा लिखे गए हर एक लेख को वह हर व्यक्ति पढ़ और आसानी से समझे यह मेरी तरफ से पूरा प्रयास रहेगा। धन्यवाद दोस्तों. Respondent s J U D G M E N T Abhay Manohar Sapre, J. In our considered opinion, having regard to the time consumed in the litigation 37 years coupled with 18 19 the findings of two Courts below wherein it was held that respondent No. In reply, the submission of learned counsel for respondent No.
In other words, his submission was that though the High Court instead of awarding any jail sentence awarded only the fine of Rs. Spears came by husband Kevin Federline's pad in Tarzana to see her young sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James, but he refused to let the troubled pop star inside. Learned counsel for the appellant State has argued only one legal point in support of the appeal. Briefly stated case of the prosecution is that one Natarajan had a quarrel with Seenu Srinivasan-accused No. Aggrieved by the verdict of conviction, accused preferred appeal before the High Court. Aksar hum log yah dekhte ya sunte hai ki kisi mohalle area mein aaj marpet fight hui hai, to aise mein jin logo ne marpet ki hai, to un logo ko kya sja milegi? Then the sentence of imprisonment is reduced to period already undergone as an undergone as an under trial and as a convict; Rohtas v.
. But this cannot be said to be an act in furtherance of common intention to commit the murder of Ramesh along with accused No. But what was supposed to be a night of celebration turned into a nightmare for the guests - Shah Rukh Khan and Shirish Kunder. Article shared by Legal provisions regarding Punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of Indian Penal Code, 1860. Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention.
In our considered opinion, having regard to the time consumed in the litigation 37 years coupled with the findings of two Courts below wherein it was held that respondent No. All the accused persons, Ram Lagan and his family members were known to each other. This image of Ipc Section 325 was posted on February 20, 2018 at 3:17 am. Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years and fine. Taking us through the evidence onbehalf of the respondent, learned Senior Counsel Mr. The High Court, by impugned judgment, partly allowed the appeal and while upholding the conviction of the five accused interfered in the sentence and its quantum awarded to each accused persons.