If they were paid, would they stay in college instead? Fallow Honors American Literature 7 April 2015 Amateurs or Athletes All Division 1 athletes put their heart and soul into the sport that they work so hard for day after day, week after week, month after month. So, where is all that money going? Since college athletes are not allowed to work, even if they have the extra time to do so, they have to sacrifice meals, new clothes, and other necessary items in order to save money for they future. To see that dependable college athletes are getting paid for their skills on the field. Payment of athletes in this regard only favors the winning teams. Another restraint to college athletes working is a time restraint. Student athletes are working day in and day out to meet academic standards and to keep their level of play competitive. Payment of college athletes would.
They can play in Europe, they can play in the D-League, they can go to college. Nothing about the way hundreds of millions of dollars is distributed is equitable or even fair. It is easy for readers to find what the argument is, the pros, the cons, and my argument. College athletes should not be paid because of the fact that they are not employees. In fact, many observers would point out that many college football players already possess the skills commonly seen among the pros. Another way they make money is when a college makes it to the championship the N.
Are mandatory testing programs effective? They consist of scholarships, free tuition, fees, and room and board. Players on the other side are awarded fringe benefits, which may constitute a college education, insurances and much more Griffin 73. Perfect, a highly successful college football student-athlete, is shattering every record once held in the sport. This leads to more problems such, as their grades will drop. These athletes make insurmountable amounts of money and an unbelievable amount of recognition for the universities.
Not only has my writing improved, but I feel my presentation skills and my vocabulary has improved as well. Acquiring sports as a career is not bad, instead it is very bright field, but leaving studies in between can be very damaging. In reality, the glut of bachelor degrees entering the workforce is lessening their value. If athletes apply for a job they are limited to only a couple of hours a day to work. The issue was brought on by the athletes over time, then caught onto coaches, sports columnists, and fans. Looking at the facts, it is difficult to decide either way.
The numbers do not match up. In fact, some sports have a lot more money to spend than others. That is exactly why student-athletes should not be paid because they are there to earn a degree not earn a paycheck by playing a sport. While the prospect of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about, when the issue is more closely examined it becomes evident that it is not enough. I would get B's and A's without really trying. The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions. To begin with, the athletes happen to be the ones responsible for the huge sums of revenue that universities receive from the college athletic competitions Jonathan, p.
Whether college athletes should or should not be paid has been a subject for debate for many years. Take this for example: Philip is a landscaper that works hard day in and day out mowing yards. In conclusion should college athletes get paid to play? I made sure that I did not use any articles that were biased just so that the reader would side with my opinion. Amateurs are defined as being non-professional, or not in the activity for gain. What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see and earned? In contrast, some people think athletes should not be paid. College athletes are suppose to be the best of the best on that level, so why do college athletes not get paid? Christina Shoemaker November 17, 2013 English 15- Dr. Athletes cannot sell their own shoes or his or her own jersey; this is one way the N.
Additionally, many who do get through college do so with the help of grants and loans. Some contend that student athletes are already being due to their scholarship and that is adequate reimbursement for their services. College athletes are in the same position as that student is determined to get that Engineering or Medicine degree. The sport they play is their job; it takes up as much time or more as the normal student's job at the cafeteria or student center, yet they do not get paid. When these college athletes play in the field, their expertise in athletics is equally the same as that of professional. Neither is the student-journalist who spends his nights writing freelance stories and picking up as much money along the way as he can. The point is that players should get something in return for their time, because most rational fans know that basketball and football players are not normal students.
Athletes end up having to study and do their school work on the bus. This would supplement the scholarships and accommodation fees university and college athletes enjoy currently. Introduction College athletics have long been in existence. Should college athletes get paid to play? His face is plastered on televisions nationwide. These organizations are raking in huge profits from merchandise sales, live events of media coverage.
The reasons why are because colleges are already providing student athletes with a scholarship to play, they are students first and athletes second, and lastly, it would be unfair to those that are not athletes. The revenue generated from college sports is a billon dollar industry, one that rewards coaches, staff members, and universities with ostentatious contracts, and gratuitous bonuses. They certainly do not only make the colleges and universities in which they are enrolled in proud; they also encourage other prospective students to entertain studying it too. One of the most overlooked and wrongly advertised reasons why college athletes should not be paid is that colleges and universities do not have the money for it. Additionally, some students are still paid some cash on top of the scholarships. That's right, football and men's basketball players get paid; lacrosse, field hockey, softball, baseball, soccer players get nothing. The claim that scholarships provide free education is false.
Same as 1, but we will also remove the paper from our site for 30 days! Paying athletes is important, the school argued, not because of the money they make for the school but because they work so hard and they often do not get a completely free ride in the sense that all of their tuition and other fees are covered. Everyone enjoys sports but does anyone ever stop to wonder how much goes into preparing for those games? They use the athletes face in the game but the athlete still makes no money. Athletes have no time to obtain even a part time job because they are also training or doing schoolwork. American colleges and universities should recognize college athletes are paid through scholarships and other opportunities and does not need to provide them additional pay. These athletes do work very hard, and they often struggle with their studies because of it. If it were completely impossible for athletic departments to find it in the budget to pay athletes extra stipends, there would be very little conversation on the topic.